Time and patience needed on LGPS reforms, Pensions UK says

"Time and patience" are needed to allow Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) reforms to bed in, Pensions UK has said, suggesting that particular patience is needed for UK pension schemes to invest in alternatives in the same way that Canadian schemes do.

Pensions UK's report analysed the government’s continued interest in adopting elements of the Canadian pension model, known as the “Maple 8”, within the LGPS, noting that, while the two systems are increasingly compared, they are not the same.

"Their scale, maturity and context differ significantly," Pensions UK deputy director of policy and advocacy, Joe Dabrowski, said.

Indeed, Pensions UK's report pointed out that the Maple 8 collectively manage over £1.1trn across just eight funds, compared to the LGPS’s £390bn spread over 86 funds within eight, soon to be six, pools. 

The report also emphasised that, in addition to scale differences, the Canadian model evolved over decades, with outcomes dependent on maintaining independence, building in-house expertise, and allowing time for strategies to mature.  

"There is clearly value in assessing international best practice and understanding what aspects of the Canadian model work well," the report stated.

"But the current relative sizes of the LGPS and Maple 8 needs to be considered, as well as the need for time to move to different configurations."

In particular, Pensions UK said that "more time and patience" is needed to allow further, significant developments in alternative investments in a similar fashion to the gradual and incremental approach taken in Canada.

"As we enter a big phase of local government pensions reform in the UK, what matters is giving it time to bed in, while carefully considering the strengths and differences between the two models," Dabrowski added.

“If the UK is to take inspiration from Canada, it should be by recognising the strengths and differences of each system, and building on what already works here, whilst keeping members’ interests at the heart of any changes.” 

Given this, Pensions UK said that it supports a structured and measured approach to reform, recognising the UK’s unique context while adopting valuable lessons from the Canadian experience, all while ensuring the interests of scheme members remain at the forefront. 

"Measures to progress pooling are bringing the LGPS closer to the Canadian model and patience is needed to see these developments take effect," it said.



Share Story:

Recent Stories


Cyber Risk
In our latest Pensions Age video, Laura Blows discusses cyber risk with Aon partner Paul McGlone, and HSBC Bank Pension Trust (UK) trustee chief risk officer, Cheryl Payne.

A changing DC market
In our latest Pensions Age video interview, Aon DC senior partner and head of DC consulting, Ben Roe, speaks to Laura Blows about the latest changes and challenges within the DC sector

Podcast: Who matters most in pensions?
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Francesca Fabrizi speaks to Capita Pension Solutions global practice leader & chief revenue officer, Stuart Heatley, about who matters most in pensions and how to best meet their needs
Podcast: A look at asset-backed securities
Royal London Asset Management head of ABS, Jeremy Deacon, chats about asset-backed securities (ABS) in our latest Pensions Age podcast

Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement