Concerns over false negatives and positives persist amid DWP scam consultation

Over one in three (37 per cent) pension transfers flagged as being 'high risk' for a scam since July 2018 would have satisfied the first condition outlined in the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) proposed legislation to fight scams, data from XPS’ Scam Protection Service has shown.

In addition to this, it revealed that 69 per cent of transfers flagged as being at some risk of a scam were likely to pass the first condition, whilst just 64 per cent of those with no scam red flags would have passed the first condition.

The provider acknowledged that the proposed conditions will allow trustees to have greater ability to prevent transfers in certain circumstances, empowering trustees to restrict transfers where there is a risk of pension scams.

However, it warned that trustees must continue to carry out “robust scam protection measures”, such as those recommended in the Pension Scams Industry Group Code on Combatting Pension Scams, including analysing incoming requests and speaking with members to ensure they understand any risks involved.

XPS Pensions Group partner, Mark Barlow, commented: “The ability for trustees to block transfers in certain circumstances is a welcome step forward in the fight against pension scams.

“However, we are concerned that these conditions could suggest that certain transfers are “scam free” when we know this not to be the case.

“Evidence from our Scam Protection Service demonstrates how robust scam protection measures will continue to be vital in protecting member outcomes”.

LCP have also warned that the new anti-scam measures risk “false positives and false negatives”, arguing that further guidance will be needed to ensure that the rules are applied consistently and ensure member benefit for members.

LCP senior consultant, Daniel Jacoboson, commented: “These new rules have been designed with the best of intentions, but we are concerned that they may not have the desired effect. Some key concepts such as ‘high cost’ or ‘high risk’ are very subjective and trustees may not be well placed to make such judgments.

“Unless further clarification is issued there is a risk of inconsistency as different trustees define these terms in different ways.

“There is also a risk of false positives – legitimate transfers being blocked – and false negatives – scam transfers being allowed through.

“We are especially concerned that trustees who have real concerns about a destination scheme will not have the right to block a transfer unless a narrow list of red flags is triggered.

"If a member only has to attend a Money and Pensions Service (Maps) interview to override trustee concerns this is likely to allow some scam transfers to slip through the net”.

The governments consultation on the proposals for tackling pension scheme fraud has been met with mixed industry response since its launch, with industry experts calling on the government to ensure balance and create guidance to support pension scheme trustees.

Commenting in response to the concerns, a DWP spokesperson said: “We have issued this consultation to gather views from industry and the public on the regulations and their application, and will consider all the views put forward.

“Pension scammers are the lowest of the low, and with the growth in recent years of online scams we must act now to curb them.”

    Share Story:

Recent Stories

DC master trusts
Pensions Age editor Laura Blows, editor of Pensions Age look at developments within the DC master trust market with Paul Leandro, partner at Barnett Waddingham, and Mark Futcher, partner and head of DC at Barnett Waddingham.
Investing in Asia
Pensions Age editor, Laura Blows, discusses with CRUX Asset Management fund manager, Ewan Markson-Brown, the opportunities for investing in Asia and CRUX Asset Management's fund launch to help with this

Advertisement Advertisement