Webb brands ‘reckless caution’ a ‘wrong’ of pension freedoms

A former Pensions Minister, Steve Webb, who served at the time the pension freedoms were introduced, has said that the thing that has “gone wrong” with the policy is “reckless caution” once savers have accessed their pots.

Speaking at a breakfast seminar hosted by Quantum Advisory, Webb, who once said that people could use their pension pots to by a Lamborghini, stated: “Ironically, the thing that has gone wrong with pensions freedoms is not buying Lamborghinis, but reckless caution with accessed funds being invested in low returning investments that do not even keep up with inflation”

Expanding on this point to Pensions Age, Webb explained that those who have worked hard and saved hard for a pension, in an era before automatic enrolment, tend to be people who are frugal and cautious and willing to defer gratification, and therefore don’t tend to become “wild spendthrifts” in retirement.

“There’s also research evidence that, on the whole, pensioners tend to be savers rather than spenders. A traditional ‘life-cycle’ model would suggest that we save during our working life and then run down our savings in retirement. But many pensioners (apart from the odd world cruise) have modest spending levels, especially as they get older, and can find that they actually have income higher than their regular outgoings. In addition, if they plan to bequeath money to their heirs, they may be particularly frugal with their spending. Again, this tends to be militate against the ‘Lamborghini’ issue,” he noted.

He also highlighted the fact that lump sum withdrawals are taxed quite aggressively, which means that even if you did want a sports car you would be very ill advised to take out a huge lump in a single year.

“Tax is ‘the brake on the Lamborghini’ and encourages people to take their money out more slowly,” he noted.

Many of Webb’s concerns have also been observed by the Financial Conduct Authority in its Retirement Outcomes Review. In particular it is concerned by people who access their tax-free cash, don’t trust the pensions industry, and so take 100 per cent out and then put the remaining in a cash ISA. It is also concerned by people who do not shop around for drawdown products and end up with their in-house provider.

As a result of this, it has proposed initiatives such as drawdown pathways, which it described as a “significant intervention” that will help consumers who enter drawdown to make investment decisions that meet their needs in retirement.

It hopes that by introducing the pathways, the overarching harm identified in its joint pensions strategy with The Pensions Regulator, will be addressed – that people don’t have adequate income, or the income they expected in retirement.

As part of the proposals, drawdown providers must give consumers entering a drawdown product that haven’t been advised, four options for how they might want to use their drawdown pot.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Risk transfer opportunities
Laura Blows speaks to Lisa Purdy, Head of Fiduciary Distribution at Legal & General Investment Management and Gavin Smith, Pricing and Execution Director - UK PRT at Legal & General, about the impact of the recent market volatility on the bulk annuity and risk transfer market and the potential opportunities for the future

Bulk annuities during coronavirus
Laura Blows speaks to Just business development manager Prash Mehta about the impact of coronavirus on transactions

Investing in infrastructure
Laura Blows speaks to James Dawes about how, and why, pension funds should be looking at infrastructure as an investment opportunity

Re-shaping the future of fiduciary management?
Pensions Age Editor, Laura Blows, speaks to River and Mercantile co-head, Ajeet Manjrekar, about the future of fiduciary management in the UK