BLOG: Unrealistic expectations

With the recent proposal to allow young people to use part of their pension pots to fund a deposit for their first home, the same old question seems to pop into my mind whenever industry figures talk about young people and pensions: how much money do they think young people are able to save?

A recent modelling structure designed to provide support to the pensions for property proposal, which was initially suggested by Housing Minister James Brokenshire, claimed that a 25-year-old should be able to use up to half of their pension on a deposit for a house.

However, the modelling structure, which was used as an example of what a future system could look like, indicated that the 25-year-old and a partner would need £22,800 in pension savings each, on a wage of £25,000 for the past five years, to be able to afford a deposit on a £228,000 home.

Not only this, but the model also required a combined contribution rate of 15 per cent and an annual ‘government top-up’, which doesn’t actually exist, both of which seem farfetched, even for the most optimistic individual.

The calculations also rely on a reduction in the auto-enrolment age, the contribution rate nearly doubling over a decade and house prices remaining unchanged, which is likely to be out of the question in the current housing market.

However, the primary issue is not the deluded figures used to estimate how much young people can save, but that models like this are being used to fit a specific argument or agenda.

The model proposed appears unachievable, but it is still being used as ‘evidence’ as to why a policy that could endanger the future financial lives of young people in the UK should be adopted.

Unfortunately, this is not uncommon. Firms often use statistics or frameworks that are tailored to fit the message they want to push.

This could be a dangerous precedent. Headlines and soundbites can form the opinion of those who do not delve deep enough to realise the stringent parameters required to fit the story agenda.

We need the industry to wake up and realise how hard it is for young people to be able to save enough for a comfortable retirement. Gone are the gold-plated DB schemes that older generations have benefitted from and living costs have soared, leaving very little in bank accounts at the end of each month.

Young people are disillusioned and unengaged in pensions, and it will only get worse if we let them chip away at their retirement savings for housing or set them unrealistic models that give them false hope into what is achievable.

Pension savings are for retirement, not for living during their working life, and issuing unrealistic models that support dangerous ideas will only give another reason for young people to disregard their pensions and continue their inertia.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


De-risking options for pension schemes
In this latest Pensions Age podcast, Linklaters' Sarah Parkin talks to Laura Blows about the wide range of choice available to pensions schemes for the partial, or full, removal of their risks

Risk transfer opportunities
Laura Blows speaks to Lisa Purdy, Head of Fiduciary Distribution at Legal & General Investment Management and Gavin Smith, Pricing and Execution Director - UK PRT at Legal & General, about the impact of the recent market volatility on the bulk annuity and risk transfer market and the potential opportunities for the future

Bulk annuities during coronavirus
Laura Blows speaks to Just business development manager Prash Mehta about the impact of coronavirus on transactions

Investing in infrastructure
Laura Blows speaks to James Dawes about how, and why, pension funds should be looking at infrastructure as an investment opportunity