Overly prescriptive approach to DB funding regs 'not fit for purpose'

The draft regulations on defined benefit (DB) funding go “much further” than what was previously consulted on, Hymans Robertson has said, warning that an overly prescriptive approach could have a “far reaching and detrimental" consequences.

Hymans Robertson partner, Patrick Bloomfield, argued that the “narrow and prescriptive approach is simply not fit for purpose across an industry with such a wide spectrum of circumstances”.

Bloomfield highlighted three particular areas that Hymans Robertson has been “deeply concerned by”, including concerns that the draft regulations “sacrifice scheme-specific flexibility, over-stepping into areas that should sit in The Pensions Regulator's (TPR) code of practice”.

The suggestion that what a business can afford to pay to its pension schemes would be prioritised over how a business needs to invest to grow was also another area of concern.

In addition to this, Bloomfield raised concerns that the narrowness of the envisaged target investment strategies could leave no room for economically efficient investing and could “supercharge” systemic risks.

He stated: “As drafted, the regulations go much further than what has been put forward in TPR’s 2020 consultation on DB funding. They also go far beyond the conclusions of the government’s Green and White papers.

“The consequences of overly prescriptive regulation will be far reaching and detrimental to businesses, scheme members and economic growth.

“The amplification of systemic risks currently being witnessed in gilt markets has potentially dire consequences that will spill beyond pensions and into debt, mortgage and foreign exchange markets."

Bloomfield argued that the regulations should be redrafted to remain broad and coherent with the current scheme-specific funding regime, and that the regulator should be empowered to regulate through the ‘fast track and bespoke’ model it has been warming the pensions industry to for the last two years.

“This would also make it easier for the industry and regulators to keep pace with the ever-changing financial and political climate," he added.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories

Making pension engagement enjoyable through technology
Laura Blows speaks to Nick Hall, business development director and Chartered Financial Planner at UK-based Wealth Wizards about the opportunities that technology provides for increasing people’s engagement with pensions and increasing their retirement wealth. Please click here for an edited write-up of the video

ESG & DC – creating the right tools
In the latest of our series of Pensions Age video interviews Francesca Fabrizi, Editor in Chief of Pensions Age is joined by Manuela Sperandeo, Head of Sustainable Indexing EMEA, BlackRock and Mark Guirey, Executive Director, Asset Owner and Consultant Coverage - MSCI to discuss some key trends of ESG investing among UK pension funds today. Please click here for an edited write-up of the video

Are current roads into retirement delivering member value?
Laura Blows explores HSBC Master Trust’s recent report, Converting pension pots into incomes, with HSBC Retirement Services CEO, Alison Hatcher.

Pension portfolios – the role of asset-backed securities
Laura Blows is joined by Royal London Asset Management (RLAM) head of sterling credit research, Martin Foden, and its Senior Fund Manager, Shalin Shah to discuss the role of asset-backed securities (ABS) within pension fund portfolios
Incorporating ESG into fixed income
Laura Blows is joined by TCW head of fixed income ESG, Jamie Franco, to discuss incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies into fixed income portfolios