DB consultants must focus on ‘end game’ as schemes reach maturity

Defined benefit pension scheme consultants must focus on the “end game” as schemes near towards the end game, according to Barnett Waddingham head of actuarial consulting Paul Houghton.

Barnett Waddingham’s Navigating Change report found that as many schemes are focused on risk reduction, which often leads towards buyout, these structural shifts are transforming the way trustees manage schemes and have led to many seeking a new actuarial consultant.

The research found that more than half of schemes say they will change, or are considering changing, their actuarial consultant in the next year. Therefore, Houghton has warned that consultants must focus on managing the scheme end game to stay relevant and meet the evolving needs of pension schemes.

DB schemes are beginning to pay out considerable amounts in benefits, and many have reduced investment risk, through the use of liability-driven investment (LDI), by matching assets to liabilities. The majority (58 per cent) are now increasing focus on de-risking and the ultimate end-game stage as a priority, while 26 per cent are considering it.

“As the number of pensioners increases, DB schemes’ cashflow is becoming restricted, often negative. They now face the end game of securing benefits for their members, and this need for cashflow security requires some reconsideration of the scheme’s strategy,” Houghton explained.

He noted that the next stage in the journey is “highly complex” and largely unknown to most DB schemes.

“It requires carefully managing risk – protecting the scheme’s capital and preventing the need for increased contributions from the sponsor – while releasing cash to pensioners. Changing actuarial consultant has been uncommon. It is often the longest established professional relationship a scheme has with an adviser. However, the research shows over half of the respondents are changing, or have already changed their actuarial consultant recently, or are considering a change.”

Evidence suggests that this is because schemes feel their current consultant may not be the necessary fit – a combination of approach, culture and skills – to rise to the challenges a scheme considering its end-game strategy faces.

“While the actuary that took a scheme through the past 20 years may have been one of the leaders in the field, they may not be the best suited for the next stage of its journey. Therefore, consultants must understand the strategic priorities and challenges facing clients as they seek to maximise returns from actuarial consulting services – otherwise face a retendering process. The industry landscape has changed, and the service delivery of the scheme’s advisers must also evolve,” Houghton said.

The report reveals free-thinking and independent advice are two themes trustees value most in this complex period of change. Independence of thought can lead to finding a more innovative approach for the next stage of the scheme’s development. It allows the consultant to focus on the scheme’s specific needs and find the right strategies to achieve them. However, almost 40 per cent of trustees reported their consultant lacks these characteristics.

“While our findings emphasise the need for a fresh approach, trustees are often unsure of what this would look like. Many trustees may not have fully considered all the skills that are relevant for this new phase, which include the core actuarial skillset and other technical and softer, interpersonal skills, as well as independence of thought and the ability to think strategically beyond the standard actuarial valuation,” he said.

“Schemes considering the appointment of a new actuarial consultant should target the most appropriate one for the next stage of the scheme’s development. There is no ‘one size fits all’ when it comes to appointing an actuary, so knowing what the scheme requires is absolutely essential. While consultants need to adapt to the changing pensions landscape, responding to the needs of trustees, it is also the responsibility of trustees to clearly define what they are looking for and design a robust assessment process.”

    Share Story:

Recent Stories

Responsible investing
Laura Blows speaks to Standard Life head of investment solutions, Gareth Trainor, about the latest responsible investment trends and developments for providers, pension schemes and their members

ESG and member engagement
Laura Blows speaks to Legal &General Investment Management head of DC, Emma Douglas, and Nest Insight Director of Research and Innovation, Jo Phillips, about member attitudes towards ESG and how this may impact upon pension fund investments

Sovereign bonds and climate change considerations
In Pensions Age's latest podcast, Laura Blows is joined by Hilary Norris, Product Manager, Sustainable Investment, EMEA, FTSE Russell, to discuss sovereign bonds and climate change considerations

Climate Investing
Laura Blows speaks to Aled Jones, Head of Sustainable Investing for Europe at FTSE Russell, and Adam Matthews, Director of Ethics and Engagement for the Church of England Pensions Board, about the role of climate investing within a pension fund portfolio.

Managing volatility
In the latest Pensions Age podcast, Laura Blows speaks to Cambridge Associates head of European pension practice, Alex Koriath, about the Covid-related market volatility and how pension funds can prepare for the challenges ahead