The first choice for people in pensions

Pensions Age has been designed to provide pensions professionals with a single and authoritative source
of information.

What about us?
AVCs for above £30,000 earners will remain, but what about those earning less than this figure? Mike Spink highlights what employers need to consider with group stakeholder plans

For employers with occupational pension schemes (OPS), the stakeholder issue has been something of a stop-start affair.

For most of last year, stakeholder was allowed to slip down the pending pile. The release of further information concerning partial concurrency for OPS members brought the issue back into focus. However, a rumour concerning a possible Inland Revenue announce-ment regarding amendments to additional voluntary contribution (AVC) cash commutation rules, put the issue back on hold.

AVC v group stakeholder
AVCs will still be required to be offered under all occupational arrangements and will (apart from free standing plans) remain the only route for voluntary contributions for members earning above £30,000 per annum.

The key areas to be examined by employers considering implementing a group stakeholder plan (GSP) for their below £30,000 earners include charges, cash commutation, flexibility and investment choice.

Charges

The majority of trustees offering money purchase AVC facilities will look to the bundled (or packaged) product market to make or review their purchase. It is this market that will see a drop in AVC charges with the introduction of stakeholder.

The reasons for the decline in charges are easily explained. To have any hope of seeing some profit arise from their stakeholder business within the maximum one per cent per annum fund charge, providers have had to invest significant sums in devising new administration systems and processes.

Once in place, the next step is to leverage this spending by including their other defined contribution products on the same platform. Many trustees should therefore be able to negotiate some reduction in existing AVC plan charges as the market finds the most efficient level at which to write defined contribution business, irrespective of the name on the wrapper.

Cash commutation
Whilst 6 April this year came and went without change to AVC cash commutation rules, the latest information to hand suggests that further news may arrive as early as October.
The Inland Revenue may decide to grant commutation rights to AVCs invested since April this year. Some employers may therefore wish to wait for further news before considering whether to implement a GSP.

Flexibility
For now, stakeholder will hold the higher ground in terms of flexibility. Whilst AVC encashment prior to normal retirement age will need to clear the trustees rule amendment and income drawdown hurdles, stakeholder will allow access to all or part of the cash/pension accrued at any point from the age of 50.

Investment choice
The degree of investment choice also currently favours the stakeholder route. Whilst the inclusion of external fund links will help to modernise AVC contracts, the degree of choice for members will still rest with the trustees, where often a conservative approach to the number of fund options offered, still prevails.

However, the lack of a with-profits option under many of the GSPs available, may lead some schemes to discount the GSP as a viable option.

Will the real purchaser please step forward The GSP purchaser is the company, rather than the trustees, and will often not be represented on the trustee body. He or she may well be someone, therefore, with whom the consultant does not currently have a business relationship.

Once the stakeholder discussion has begun, communication issues will quickly arise. How will relevant members be assisted with the stakeholder v AVC decision? Should the employer now become the provider of generic investment information, providing details of non-pension savings routes?

If nothing else, stakeholder and partial concurrency may yet help ensure that the financial education that defined contribution members will increasingly need, becomes a reality.

Mike Spink is a principal at Aon Consulting Ltd

– Pensions Age June 2001–

BACK TO JUNE FEATURES
BACK TO FEATURES ARCHIVEE
BACK TO HOME PAGE