The first choice for people in pensions

Pensions Age has been designed to provide pensions professionals with a single and authoritative source
of information.

Decisions decisions

Both stakeholder pensions and GPPs exempt from stakeholder place several requirements on the employer. Ian Naismith compares these requirements

From 8 October 2001, most employers will have a statutory duty to offer pensions to their staff. There is no obligation for the employer to pay into the pension (that may come later), but the government hopes employee access will lead to a change in pension provision.

Employers are exempt from the new requirements if they have fewer than five employees, or if no employee had earnings from that employer above the lower earnings limit (currently £72 a week) every week in the last 13. Otherwise pension access must be provided.
Some employers will set up occupational pension schemes, probably on a money purchase basis. While this has some advantages, for example, employees do not have to be offered membership until they have worked with the company for a year, it normally involves considerable administration by the employer.

The other options are a group personal pension (GPP) or a stakeholder pension. With these, the employer normally does not set up a new scheme, though that is now possible, but offers access to a pension providers scheme.

Choosing a scheme
Employers who are not exempt must designate a stakeholder scheme after consulting with employees and their representatives, for example, trade unions. The employer must also ensure that the scheme chosen is on the OPRA register of stakeholder schemes. No consultation is needed for GPPs. However, the employer must ensure that the provider’s contract has no penalties if members transfer or stop contributing. This does not prevent deductions that effectively recover set-up costs, and many plans with such deductions will satisfy the exemption requirement.

Membership
With stakeholder, membership must be offered to all relevant employees, which includes all employees under 75 who have worked for the employer for at least 13 weeks, and have earned more than the lower earnings limit every week of the last 13. There is no lower age limit.

The employer must advertise the stakeholder scheme to employees, and allow the provider access to employees to market the scheme. When employees request payroll deductions for contributions, the employer must acknowledge receipt of the request within 14 days, and provide certain information specified in the regulations.

The access requirement for exempt GPPs is the same as for stakeholder, except that membership does not have to be offered to employees younger than 18. For an exempt GPP the employer must also include the membership and contribution entitlement in contracts of employment.

However, this is not required if the employer can demonstrate in writing that contributions to an arrangement were paid continuously since before 8 October 2001 as if they were in the contract of employment.

There has been some confusion over exactly what “arrangement” means here, but we understand the policy intention is that it relates to an individual employee’s arrangement, not to the GPP as a whole. A strict reading of the regulations supports this, but it is different from what some government bodies have stated. For both stakeholder and GPP the employer must keep track of new employees and offer them access to a pension when the regulations require it.

Payment levels
An employer does not have to pay into an employee’s stakeholder plan. The employee also cannot be required to contribute to a plan. However, an employer may offer to match employee contributions for example, by contributing the same amount as the employee up to a maximum of 3 per cent of basic pay. This is common in the USA for 401K plans, which influenced government thinking on stakeholder.

For exempt GPPs standard employer contributions must be at least 3 per cent of basic pay. The employer can also insist on the employee contributing. For arrangements started from 8 October 2001 onward, the maximum compulsory contribution can be no more than 3 per cent of basic pay. For earlier arrangements, the compulsory employee contribution can be higher than this, but not more than the employer is paying.

If an employee is not willing to pay a 3 per cent contribution but is happy with, say, 2 per cent, it appears that the employer can offer to match that lower amount without losing the exemption. However, the employee retains the contractual right to the 3 per cent, and the employer contribution must be increased if the employee subsequently decides to pay the 3 per cent.

Payment administration
For both GPP and stakeholder, the employer must offer to deduct employee contributions from their pay and pass them on to the provider with any company payments. The employer must maintain a payment record showing contributions due and ensure that the provider has an up-to-date copy. Payments must be made no later than the due date, the 19th of the month for employee contributions after they are deducted from pay. Normally the employer due date will be the same as the employee one and employers should aim to pass on contributions well before it.

With exempt GPPs, the employer must ensure that each contribution meets the exemption requirements. This could be an issue if, for example, the compulsory employee contribution was expressed as a percentage of total pay and a large bonus was paid one month. Because of this, most exempt GPPs will probably have contributions expressed as a percentage of basic salary.

Both stakeholder and GPP contributions can change from time to time. With stakeholder, employees have a statutory right to change their contribution levels every six months. If a change is requested within six months of a previous one, the employer can refuse it but must tell the employee when the next change will be allowed. There are no equivalent requirements for a GPP and for example, the company could make a rule that employee contributions can only change on the scheme anniversary.

Issues for advisers
In guiding an employer, an adviser will cover the administrative differences between stakeholder and GPP, and a strong employer preference could determine which will be offered. Otherwise, the underlying features of the two must be considered.

The FSA requires personal pension recommendation to be accompanied by reasons why the adviser considers it at least as suitable as stakeholder. The closer the personal pension is to the stake-holder CAT standard, particularly on charges, the easier this will be.

A possible reason for recommending GPP is that the full cost of advice can be included in the product. This could be used to justify the recommendation, particularly if employees will receive individual advice. However, the government expects that individuals will be able to make judgements based on decision trees, so the need for advice must itself be justified.

Many GPPs offer extensive investment choices which may be important where employees are relatively sophisticated. Although stakeholder options are wider than originally expected, some providers now including with-profits and external funds, higher-charging specialist funds and the possibility of self-investment may differentiate GPPs.

The range of allowable benefits for stakeholder and GPP is identical, but term assurance and bolt-on waiver plans may be more commonly offered with GPPs. They may also offer a more personalised service from provider and adviser.

Summary
Neither stakeholder nor GPP is better in all situations. Where product features and charges are similar, the choice may well depend on which the employer is more comfortable administering. Where charges are above the stakeholder limit, careful justification of a GPP recommendation is essential.

Stakeholder may account for the majority of future sales, especially if the banks are successful in marketing it to their small business customers. The GPP market should remain healthy and IFAs are likely to recommend both products, depending on the client company’s individual circumstances.

Ian Naismith is a pensions strategy manager at Scottish Widows

– Pensions Age June 2001–

BACK TO JUNE FEATURES
BACK TO FEATURES ARCHIVEE
BACK TO HOME PAGE