Pensions
Age has been designed to provide pensions professionals with a
single and authoritative source of information.
Deflated
any longer?
Richard Dingwall-Smith asks
if bond investors should worry that central banks are taking risks
with inflation.
The global economy
has weakened very sharply over the last six months. Few countries
have been spared as the downturn has been transmitted around the
world by the collapse of global trade and by the much reduced flow
of capital and lending across borders. It now looks likely that
global output will contract in 2009 for the first time in sixty
years.
All else being equal, these developments would put additional downward
pressure on inflation. An increased margin of spare resources produces
a squeeze on profit margins in the near term. It may also depress
pay and other costs, leading to continuing downward momentum in
prices.
Of course all else is not equal, given the major response from governments
and central banks. On the fiscal side, an easing equivalent to about
three per cent of global GDP has been put in place (albeit spread
over more than one year). Further fiscal action looks likely, as
governments try to offset the retrenchment going on in the private
sector. Moreover, governments are using substantial amounts of taxpayer
funds to deal with the problems in the banking system, in an attempt
to get credit flowing again.
However, the major issue for the inflation outlook is the impact
of monetary stimulus in the form of extremely low interest rates
and quantitative easing. In the US, the Federal Reserve has so far
this year announced plans to buy $1,750 billion of Treasury securities,
mortgage backed securities and agency debt from the private sector.
This is equivalent to 12 per cent of GDP and is likely to lead to
a surge in monetary assets held by the non-bank private sector.
Similarly in the UK, broad money may be directly boosted by about
7.5 per cent if the Bank of England undertakes the full £150
billion of asset purchases that the Chancellor has authorised. Switzerland
and Japan have also seen some degree of quantitative easing; and
the ECB may adopt similar measures.
Possible
results
Will this inevitably feed through to inflation? In the short-term,
the answer is no. The velocity of money may simply collapse, with
money left sitting on deposit without much implication for spending
or asset values. Indeed it is possible to imagine a situation in
which output remains depressed, problems in the banking system persist
and deflation develops despite the efforts of central banks –
a classic liquidity trap.
However, a more probable outcome is that the global economy will
gradually turn around, returning to positive but with muted growth
by the end of 2009. This would reflect fiscal stimulus and an improvement
of credit availability and confidence; and also an end to the inventory
correction which has had a particularly severe effect in recent
months. In response, monetary velocity is likely to pick up again,
adding to the upward movement in real activity and also feeding
through to inflation.
The issue then is how quickly central banks reverse the policies
that they have put in place. For the moment the pressure on monetary
authorities is to ‘do what it takes’ to get economies
moving again; and they may be reluctant to change course until a
recovery is unequivocally underway. And of course the lags from
monetary policy to activity and inflation are notoriously long and
variable. Clearly there is some risk that central banks could get
it badly wrong.
The probability that inflation surges to levels not seen since the
1970s is probably no greater than the probability that the economy
becomes mired in deflation. But there is a greater risk that central
banks are implicitly ready to accept a period of above-target inflation
– say five per cent for a couple of years – as a price
worth paying to escape the current difficulties.
Such an outturn would be no great problem for equities. But government
debt has once again become expensive. Investors have focussed on
the short-term supply and demand implications of quantitative easing
and have given little thought to what the position may look like
a year or two ahead as economies begin to recover, inflation expectations
move up and central banks start to unwind earlier asset purchases.
In particular, US Treasuries with a ten year yield of about 2.7
per cent at the time of writing, and UK gilts at about 3.3 per cent
offer poor value.