Towers Watson

Administration Seminar

By Adam Cadle

The Royal Bank of Scotland’s (RBS) plans to require its employees to work an extra five years from 60 to 65 in order to receive pension entitlements has been met with widespread anger among members of Unite.

The union, which represents RBS staff, also displayed its discontent at the fact that workers will have to pay five per cent of their salary in contributions in order to retire at 60 on full retirement benefits. Unite argued that with 28,000 workers receiving no pay rise this year, the changes would result in the pension scheme becoming “unaffordable” for many.

Unite national officer David Fleming commented: “The bank is attempting to push through these changes without any proper negotiations with the union. We will be campaigning against these plans and we demand that RBS gets around the table and negotiates with Unite.”

A spokesperson for RBS argued that the changes were “essential” in order to “sustain the final salary pension scheme given the continued improvements in life expectancy.”

Home     More News


The Pensions Insurance Specialist

Other stories you may find of interest:

Unite shouts about further pension slashes
The UK's biggest trade union, Unite, has said that the Royal Bank of Scotland's (RBS) defined benefit (DB) pension scheme changes are a "body blow" to the bank's 60,000-strong workforce

Cherie Booth on board for RBS class action
Cherie Booth QC has been hired by North Yorkshire and Merseyside council pension funds to act as special advisor in their application for lead plaintiff in a class action against RBS in the US courts

rodger-wembley-stadium-banner


This website is a part of Perspective Publishing Limited, registered in England No 2876166.
By using this website you agree to our COOKIE POLICY and PRIVACY POLICY.